Medicare data → Client decisions
Slide 1 of 10

01 / The central argument

We already have the data.
Here is what it lets us sell.

CMS Intelligence Engine · Internal pitch · October 2026

The commercial value is not the warehouse. It is the analysis, judgment and client decisions the warehouse makes possible.

This view reorganizes today's 10-slide presentation into a navigable visual narrative. All examples and numbers come from the deck.

02 / The opportunity

Clients buy answers.
Not infrastructure.

The business model combines public CMS evidence with specialized market access expertise.

01 · INPUTPublic Medicare data

Spending, plans, utilization, providers, access and reimbursement.

02 · METHODConnected analyses

Join and interpret multiple data sources instead of isolated lookups.

03 · EXPERTISEAnalyst judgment

Explain limitations, implications and practical options.

04 · OUTPUTClient decision

Inform competitive strategy, market access, billing or outreach.

The distinction: data access is necessary, but interpretation and actionable deliverables are what clients purchase.

The deck references Avalere as a business-model comparison, not a claim of comparable data or service capabilities.

03 / Existing resources

What we already have

Downloaded CMS public use files, organized across major Medicare market-access domains.

Data resourceHistory represented in deck
Billing and codingCurrent HCPCS, ICD-10, CPT references; HCPCS files 2017–2026
Drug spending / utilizationAnnual 2017–2024; preliminary Part B quarterly 2025–Q1 2026
Payment limits / ASPQuarterly 2017–Q4 2026
Plans and enrollmentLandscape 2025–2027; benefits 2019–2026; enrollment through Sep 2026
Formulary / UMJanuary 2019–September 2026
Provider activityPart D and Part B 2017–2024; hospital outpatient 2019–2024
Pharmacy networksPlan network files for held formulary years
Plan/parent/county crosswalks2026–2027 with county reference data
CMS public use files exclude identifiable beneficiary data, though provider files identify clinicians and practices. File inventory is not identical to the narrower date windows available through some public UI lookups. Pharmacy coverage by year was not independently verified in the source deck.

04 / Five consulting capabilities

Five questions our clients ask

01 · COMPETITIONMarket & Competitive Intelligence

What's changing in my therapeutic market, and how should I respond?

02 · ECONOMICSCoding, Reimbursement & Drug Economics

How is my therapy coded, covered and paid?

03 · ACCESSPayer, Coverage & Access

Where is my therapy available, and what restrictions apply?

04 · PROVIDERSProvider, Patient-Pathway & Geographic

Which clinicians and geographies drive observable use?

05 · STRATEGYCommercial Strategy & Scenario Planning

How do competitive and policy changes affect positioning?

Proof rather than promise: four completed analyses and one delivered client product illustrate these capabilities.

05 / Market & competitive intelligence

The retinal market is shifting

Share of reported claims among four named anti-VEGF products, not the entire anti-VEGF market.

49.7% → 43.8%

Eylea 2 mg + Eylea HD combined share

+6.9 pp

Pavblu share change

Claim-share mix
Full-year 2025 versus preliminary Q1 2026; compare shares, not absolute claim counts.
2025
Q1 2026
Eylea 2 mgEylea HDVabysmoPavblu
Interpretation: the original Eylea presentation is declining while HD and Pavblu are gaining claim share within this four-product basket.
Source deck caveats: preliminary fee-for-service quarterly data; no Medicare Advantage claims; Pavblu’s Q5147 code started April 2025; other therapies are excluded. The analysis cannot establish patient switching or causation.

06 / Coding & reimbursement

From codes to a client deliverable

Example: Lembaz (adrabetadex) billing and coding guide for Beren — already delivered by the team.

DIAGNOSISE75.242

Niemann-Pick disease type C.

PRODUCT BILLINGC9399 · J3490 · J3590

Potential unclassified/miscellaneous product codes depend on payer and site; NDC on claims.

ADMINISTRATION96450 · 62328 · 62329

Candidate codes for intrathecal administration, requiring service-specific review.

PRACTICAL OUTPUTForms + checklist

Sample UB-04 and CMS-1500 claims, coding considerations and tracking guidance.

Client value: integrate coding rules, reimbursement considerations and site-specific workflows into actionable provider guidance.
The source explicitly notes that code selection depends on payer, site of care, service and product classification. The slide also covers anesthesia and sedation codes.

07 / Payer, coverage & access

Formulary listing is not unrestricted access

Medicare Part D access for oral CGRP migraine products, January 2024 to September 2026.

+48.7 pp

Qulipta listing increase since January 2024

97%

PA among listed plans for all three, approximately

National formulary listing
September 2026 · Percentage of relevant plan options listing each specified strength.
Qulipta 60 mg
73.1%
Nurtec ODT 75 mg
80.8%
Ubrelvy 50 mg
79.5%
ProductJan 2024 listedSep 2026 MA-PDSep 2026 PDPPA among listed
Qulipta24.4%74.7%49.9%97.0%
Nurtec81.1%81.4%72.2%97.2%
Ubrelvy41.9%81.7%49.9%97.0%
Client decision: prioritize the channel and plan types where formulary gaps persist; evaluate PA criteria rather than equating listing with real access.
Different snapshots contain different plan populations. PA flags do not disclose criteria; indications differ across the three products. Enrollment-weighted reach was not established in the deck.

08 / Provider & geographic intelligence

Finding clinicians one step from the patient

2024 Medicare Part D prescribers for a urea cycle disorder therapy basket; an investigative starting point for ARG1-D targeting.

51

Unique NPIs

1,016

Published claims

25

States represented

Claims by prescriber specialty
2024 · Width reflects percentage of all 1,016 published claims.
Pediatrics
430
Genetics
341
Neurology
72
NP
68
Other
105
75.9% of claims came from pediatrics or medical genetics/genomics. The provider roster can direct further medical and field research.
Observed use of these UCD products does not demonstrate ARG1-D diagnosis or treatment. Provider practice location is not patient residence; suppressed claims are unknown rather than zero.

09 / Commercial strategy

A concentrated SGLT2 market

2024 Medicare Part D gross spending combined with a separate September 2026 formulary-access snapshot.

$18.20B

2024 gross Part D class spending

91.9%

Class gross spending attributed to Jardiance + Farxiga brands

Major branded products · 2024 gross spending
US$ billions · Linear scale within this chart.
Jardiance
$11.44B
Farxiga
$5.29B
Smaller product rows · separate detail scale
US$ millions · Rescaled for readability; do not compare bar lengths to the chart above.
Invokana
$272M
Unbranded dapagliflozin
$202M
Steglatro
$16.5M
Inpefa
$5.9M
Access divergence: in September 2026, brand Farxiga was listed on 57.5% of plan options while unbranded dapagliflozin was listed on 100%.
Amounts are pre-rebate gross spending. Drug rows shown are not the entire class. Brand and unbranded formulary listing populations can overlap. The deck does not demonstrate any causal effect from Medicare drug price negotiation.

10 / The business decision

Use what already exists

Which of these completed analyses or client deliverables belongs in a current client conversation?
STEP 1Select one engagement

Start with a live client need rather than a hypothetical use case.

STEP 2Define the decision

Identify precisely what question the analysis helps answer.

STEP 3Show the work

Bring an existing analysis or deliverable into the client conversation.

Core message: demonstrate commercial value with evidence already available. The ask is client application, not a new platform build.
Source: uploaded internal pitch · October 2026